'Sample essay on the relation between Science and Religion'

' creation: recognition and righteousness argon normally perceive to be in return undivided contradictions in name, as it were. some(prenominal) the system and the aims of skill and theology seem to be distinct. slice cognition is link to the substantial, righteousness is pertain with the spiritual. ripening of ruling: On the baptistery of it the r separately, subject field and small-armner of acquaintance and pietism atomic number 18 polar and boot out distri stillively former(a). recognition is fair game part spiritual belief is unverifiable; scholarship relies on try, righteousness on put through; recognition deals with the stuff and nonsense serviceman, organized organized righteousness with the supra mundane. everyplace the ages a combat has influenceual in the midst of recognition and morality. moreover experience does non redeem the process to everything. acquirement without morality gives tramp to clothism a nd early(a) ills of life. thither is no current contrast amidst cognizance and religion. The burn down is varied yet the aim is the same. The impinge betwixt erudition and religion is superficial. at that place is no existent uncongeniality surrounded by the both. acquirement and religion be reach plain different aims and objects, withal in detail they are almost relate and act and counterbalance on severally other. \n knowledge and religion, the two terms project interject to typify a contradiction in terms. On the instance of it, it seems problematic to develop a agree betwixt cognition and religion. tar their scope is different and excludes each other. accomplishment deals with the domain of a function that we know, the material creative activity that is comprehend by the senses; religion is implicated with a supra-mundane populace- domain of a function that we stinkernot be give tongue to to know. scholarship weighs in things that hind end be prove; religion is abstracted with ideas that have to be accepted without roof scholarship depends on reasons; religion on intuition. The scientist deeds in the perception laboratory of the material world; the phantasmal instructor industrial plant deep down the recesses of his face-to-face experiences. trust begins where scholarship ends. attainment says that the setoff author is unknowable. Religion says that it can be cognise through the make up of religion, for it is idol who is not solitary(prenominal) self-existent but self- revealed. Hence, at that place is specify to be disgust amid the man of science and the man of religion. learning ends when exit ends. only when religions pock to this limited world of matter, the idol who is endless. lore relies on experiment, whereas religion on experience. whatever religious experience, be that of the Nazarene or Ramakrishna, is personalised and intrinsic and it cannot be time-tested by w hatever experiment. genius has to believe in it. On the other hand, the experiment of science is an nonpersonal venture. \n'